Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Watchdog ~ Your tax dollars at work.

Archive for the 'Taxes' Category

Where do your sales tax dollars actually go?

September 17th, 2009, 3:12 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

piggy-bankCongratulations! You just ran out and bought that new car. The sticker price was $25,000 - but when they added the sales tax, you wound up coughing up another $2,187.50. Ouch!

  • The sales tax rate in Orange County is 8.75 percent this year.
  • (It’s 9.75 percent in Los Angeles, and 10.25 percent on Catalina Island, if that makes you feel any better.)
  • In 2007 - the latest year for which figures are available - Orange County had a rather stunning $57.3 billion in taxable sales, according to the state Board of Equalization. 
  • That translates to more than $5 billion in sales taxes collected in our fair county.

So, where does it go? Well, For every dollar you spend: Read the rest of this entry »

Where do your local property tax dollars actually go?

August 10th, 2009, 12:42 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

proptaxdollars2


This is a question we at the Watchdog ponder twice a year, as we take a deep breath and write that check to the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector.

So here is the answer, for 2008-2009:

  • Nearly half goes to schools.
  • About 30 cents go to local cities (20 cents directly, with another 10 cents going to “community redevelopment agencies” - i.e., the city wearing a different hat)
  • The County of Orange gets 12 cents
  • Special districts (water, sewer, fire, library, cemetery, etc.) get 11 cents.

Does that seem like the right way to divvy things up to you? Hmmmm…..

Anyway, these gems come to us courtesy the “County of Orange: Facts and Figures 2009,” a report which is chock full of interesting tidbits Read the rest of this entry »

California’s $3 billion stem-cell experiment suffers from appearance of self-dealing

June 30th, 2009, 3:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

embryonic-stem-cellsIt was a highly controversial and emotional campaign back in 2004, but California voters said yes! to Proposition 71, which allows Golden State scientists to do stem cell research with human embryos, and pumps $3 billion of public money into the effort to boot.

Since then,$700 million has been distributed for stem cell research, and another $900 million in private money has been raised. (Nearly $53 million has poured into UC Irvine, and its Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center  is building a $67 million research institute on campus.)

But The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) - created by Prop. 71 to regulate the research and dole out that $3 billion - is not adequately protecting taxpayers’ interests or serving its own ambitious goals, a state watchdog panel concluded in a report released Friday.

“Although Proposition 71 passed with almost 60 percent of the vote, skepticism continues to surface Read the rest of this entry »

Some water officials use office for personal gain, report says

June 24th, 2009, 4:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

You wash my back, I’ll wash yours!worms

The Orange County grand jury unearthed some wriggling worms while peering beneath the rocks to probe the (largely invisible) world of  O.C.’s billion-dollar water districts, finding that:

  • Some water district governing board members – quite a few of whom run consulting businesses – appear to use their positions for personal gain, “conducting professional practices” with other water districts, and using their elected positions “to promote their competitiveness.”
  • Perhaps not unrelated? “Procedures for the selection of professional consultants’ contracts are somewhat lax and in some instances non-existent, thereby creating a perception of bias in the selection of candidates, especially in the selection of board members from other member agencies to provide professional services.”

So if you ever wonder why there are a dozen of these wee governments (full list below), or why they tend to fight consolidation tooth and nail, well, perhaps this sheds some light?

“Safe water for the average residents of Orange County should be the concern of these people, not things that may benefit any particular individual,” said James Perez, foreman of the 2008-09 grand jury (and, er, retired administrator for the Federal Bureau of Investigation).

Districts have 90 days to respond – in writing — to the grand jury’s report. Many officials are declining comment until they craft a formal response; but a canvas through our sources in Water World found quite a variety of reaction, from “They don’t know what the %^&% they’re talking about” to “We have very strict ethical guidelines in place already” to “Hmm. Term limits aren’t such a bad idea!” (Thanks to Irvine Ranch Water District for its detailed response, which you can read here.)

One might ponder all this as water rates skyrocket and one strives to conserve the stuff.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST? Read the rest of this entry »

Tax prep giant must stop deceptive ads and pay more than $1 million

June 23rd, 2009, 4:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

libertyBorrower, beware!

Attorney General Jerry Brown - who, by the way, is running for governor (again) - won a lawsuit last week barring Liberty Tax Service from dressing up high-cost loans as “free tax refunds.”

Liberty -  one of the nation’s top tax preparation services with more than 100 offices in and around Orange County - ”lured cash-strapped Californians into paying for high-cost loans, when they could obtain tax refunds free from the IRS just weeks later,” Brown said in a press release. “This ruling bars Liberty from deceptive advertising that blurs the line between IRS tax refunds and pricey loans.”

Liberty’s print and TV ads misled customers by promising “Most Refunds in 24 Hours,” Brown said. In reality, Liberty was selling “refund anticipation loans,” not tax refunds, requiring customers to pay an upfront fee of about $30 plus interest that could reach 395 percent annually.

Tax refunds, Brown points out, are available at no charge from the Internal Revenue Service and arrive one to four weeks after returns are filed.

“Liberty violated the Unfair Competition Law…and the False Advertising Law,” says the ruling, which you can read here ( libertyjudgment). Liberty must pay $1.3 million in penalties and restitution, the court ordered.

Liberty is “the fastest growing retail income tax preparation firm in the industry’s history,” according to its web site. “Founded in 1997 by CEO John T. Hewitt, a pioneer in the tax industry, Liberty Tax has prepared over 6,000,000 individual income tax returns and currently operates 3,200 offices throughout the United States and Canada.”

“We intend to appeal,” Liberty spokeswoman Martha O’Gorman said in an email to The Watchdog. Read the rest of this entry »

Former Anaheim city manager hits jackpot with pension

May 12th, 2009, 3:00 am by Tony Saavedra, Register investigative reporter

ruth2006Few have profited from California’s government retirement system as former Anaheim city manager Jim Ruth — who is one of the highest-paid retirees at $219,045 a year.

Ruth, 73, continues working, earning another $225,000 annually from another local agency.

Even he says government retirements need to be reformed.

“They’ve got to look at some way to restructure the system,” said Ruth. “When you look at the cost of that system, I don’t think we can any longer afford that.”

Not that he’s willing to cut his pension.

“I got up everyday, went out and earned my money.”

Public workers in California enjoy pensions nearly equal to their salaries — guaranteed by taxpayers and available as early as age 50. If the funding falls short, the taxpayers pay the difference.

Ruth is the 13th highest -paid retiree in the California Public Employees’ Retirement System.

He worked for Anaheim for 22 years, ultimately leading efforts to expand the Disneyland resort and build what is now the Honda Center.

He went on to become interim chief executive officer of Orange County — at $205,000 a year for two years. Under his stewardship, the county approved a lucrative raise in retirement benefits, effective retroactively, for general workers.

He now is at the helm of the $601 million Orange County Sanitation District, earning $225,000 — which includes a $43,443 raise last September. That means he makes nearly $450,000 a year in pay and retirement.

Ruth doesn’t view his arrangement as double-dipping. Read the rest of this entry »

Attention, tiny nonprofits: IRS deadline for filing is Friday - or else!

May 11th, 2009, 11:06 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

handsIt used to be that wee little nonprofits - those hauling in less than $25,000 a year - didn’t have to provide financial details to Uncle Sam.

Those days are gone.

Our friends at the Internal Revenue Service  ask us to remind small nonprofits that they must file “e-postcards” (Form 990-N) with their bare-boned financials, and that the deadline is Friday, May 15.

This is the second year of the new requirement. If organizations fail to file for three consecutive years, they automatically lose their tax-exempt status.

Deadline nuance: Read the rest of this entry »

County to spend $3.6 million on garbage exhibits at Science Center

May 5th, 2009, 3:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

garbage-exhibit

Orange County’s children may soon be sorting through trash, thanks to the County of Orange’s Waste & Recycling department and the Discovery Science Center.

Last week, county supervisors agreed to spend $3.6 million to create the “Eco-Shopping Store” and the “Waste Identification Game” - two new exhibits at the popular Santa Ana kids’ museum  designed to teach environmental stewardship.

(This is no joke, though we promise to provide you with one at the end of this post.)

  • The Eco-Shopping Store - phase one - will cost $2 million. It “simulates a real life shopping experience where patrons earn points by purchasing products with less packagwaste-exhibiting, reusable containers, recycled packaging, recyclable products, and recyclable shopping bags,” according to a staff report.
  • The Waste Identification Game - phase two - will cost $1.6 million. It’s a “large scale interactive learning game. Teams will earn points by correctly identifying and sorting waste on a conveyor belt and placing it in appropriate receptacles (e.g. bins for yard waste, recyclables, trash, and hazardous materials). In addition, strategically placed learning stations with videos will demonstrate where these materials go after collection and that proper recycling preserves landfill capacity.”
Should the county spend $3.6 million on science museum exhibits?

Why, exactly, is the county spending money on, er, trashy museum exhibits? Read the rest of this entry »