Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Watchdog ~ Your tax dollars at work.

Archive for the 'Public health' Category

Three Mile Island’s license renewed for 20 years

November 11th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

chinasyndrome01Readers of a certain level of maturity will find it interesting that Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station’s operating license has been extended for 20 years.

In 1979, a reactor at Three Mile Island suffered a partial core meltdown - the most serious accident in the history of American commercial nuclear power. Radioactive gases were released into the atmosphere, including the particularly dangerous iodine-131. Officials say  it wasn’t enough to cause additional cancers, but at least one rigorous scientific study says the impact was much greater.

That accident, however, was in reactor Unit 2. The license has been extended for  reactor Unit 1. It will expire in 2034, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says.

Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island accident essentially halted the construction of nuclear power plants in America for a generation. It happened just days after the release of the thriller ”The China Syndrome,” which tells the story of a reporter and cameraman who uncover serious safety cover-ups at a nuclear power plant. An accident, whispers a character in the film, could render “an area the size of Pennsylvania” permanently uninhabitable; a core meltdown could essentially burn clear through the Earth to, well, China.

When actor Michael Douglas appeared on ”The Tonight Show“ after the accident, Johnny Carson quipped, ”Boy, you sure have one hell of a publicity agent.”

The NRC anticipated such reminiscences.  Read the rest of this entry »

Deep flaws haunt state’s system for attacking elder abuse, report says

November 6th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

elder-abuseThere are deep flaws in California’s approach to detecting and responding to elder abuse and neglect - flaws that prevent serious cases from ever coming to light, according to a new report form the California Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes.

California has more than 9,000 nursing and residential care facilities for the elderly, and 290,000 licensed beds, according to federal statistics. Riding herd on them are about 1,000 “long-term care ombudsmen” - people originally meant to be watchdog/mediators, doing spot checks of facilities, following up on complaints, and helping make life better for residents by serving as intermediates, and advocates, with management.

But something else has happened entirely, according to the report.

Because of laws California has adopted, these watchdog/mediators have morphed into the front line for investigating serious reports of elder abuse and neglect. That gives rise to several problems - the least of which may be that there’s no time for the routine spot checks and patient advocacy that was originally envisioned.

Ombudsmen - now legally tasked with very serious investigations of suspected abuse and neglect - can only tell law enforcement about problems if the complaining parties agree to release their names and complaints.

Only one-quarter agree to this. Which means 75 percent of complaints essentially disappear.

What precisely are we talking about here? Assault, sexual  harassment, financial exploitation, physical neglect…. grim stuff.

Why won’t people sign their names to complaints? Well, if you had to keep living in the place you were complaining about - or have your most basic and intimate needs attended to by someone you were complaining about - you might be a bit frightened of attaching your name to the complaint, too. Read the rest of this entry »

Refusing to keep secrets, ‘risk-taking’ mayor releases confidential memo

October 26th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

confidential-memoWe at The Watchdog get a special thrill when anything marked CONFIDENTIAL comes our way - but rarely do they come boldly, and signed, and from elected representatives all too ready and willing to rock the boat, to boot!

“Although this memo, and most all memos originating from the District Director are prominently marked
“Confidential”, I find no legal support for any obligation of confidentiality on a Board Member,” wrote Robert Ming, attorney and mayor of Laguna Niguel, recently to fellow members of the Orange County Vector Control District’s board (and, um, us! See: confidential-memo).

“As an elected representative of the public it is my responsibility to represent their interests, not conceal matters from them. I did not agree to keep matters regarding the operation of this district secret from the public when I became a Board Member, and I do not now agree to any such obligation. Only matters falling within the limited areas which the Brown Act permits to be discussed in closed session should carry any obligation of confidentiality.”

Be still our beating heart.

Ming (left), is making life difficult for Gerard Goedgoedharthart (right), the general mingmanager of the Orange County Vector Control District, one of the more quixotic local governments you’ll ever run across. Vector’s $11 million mission is to keep the county safe from rats, mosquitoes and other nasties that carry disease. Ming (an attorney who - watch out! - was once a research assistant for then-U.S. Solicitor General Kenneth Starr) has some fundamental questions about why this needs to be its own independent little government, and he’s gunning to get Vector to contract out some of its functions.

Ming’s reasoning goes something like this: There’s a plethora of private pest control companies out there, killing the heck out of rats every day. Why on earth do we need a separate government to kill rats, too?  Read the rest of this entry »

Chriss Street rejects Oceanside hospital loan

October 13th, 2009, 2:19 pm by Ronald Campbell

Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector Chriss Street pulled the plug today on a proposed $80 million loan to Tri-City Medical Center in Oceanside. The publicly owned hospital had hired Street’s personal attorney, Phil Greer, to lobby O.C. supervisors — but not Street himself — on the deal.

In a memo to supervisors, Street said financial uncertainties, including fierce competition and local voters’ unwillingness to raise taxes, outweighed the hospital’s strengths.

An analysis prepared last week by Street’s chief investment officer, Paul Cocking, cited “recent turmoil at the board level” as one reason for turning down the hospital loan. The board ousted management in late 2008, and several of the former managers are suing.

The district’s voters turned down a bond measure to rebuild the hospital, which faces a 2030 deadline to meet state earthquake standards.

Tri-City also faces two well-funded competitors, Palomar Pomerado Health, which is completing a $900 million expansion, and Scripps Health, which is beginning a $350 million expansion, Cocking wrote.

“Community residents may like the idea of a local hospital,” Cocking wrote. “However, they seem to prefer a hospital not supported by taxes.”

Tri-City had borrowed $58.3 million in spring 2007 using “auction-rate securities,” essentially a series of 1-week loans. Auction-rate securities were popular at the time because interest rates for public agencies were low.

But just a few months later, in mid-2007, the worldwide credit crunch erupted, squeezing the auction-rate market tight. Interest on the Tri-City loan soared from the expected 3 percent to peak at 17.5 percent. Tri-City was paying $500,000 a month more in interest than it had expected.

Desperate to refinance, the hospital district turned first to San Diego County Treasurer-Tax Collector Dan McAllister. When McAllister wouldn’t bite, the district turn to Orange County.

The district hired Greer – who has represented four of the five O.C. supervisors as well as Street – to lobby the supervisors in August for $50,000. It promised him an additional $200,000 if the supervisors approved the loan by Sept. 9. That deadline came and passed with the loan request still in Street’s office.

Greer represents Street in a pending lawsuit accusing the treasurer of defrauding the bankrupt Fruehauf Trailer Corp. when he was its trustee. That lawsuit is scheduled for trial in Los Angeles in early February.

Greer and Tri-City CEO Larry Anderson did not return messages seeking comment.

Governor vetoes anti-puppy mill bill

October 12th, 2009, 1:49 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

schwarzenegger-and-dogIt passed in the state Assembly,  and it passed the state Senate, but it died this weekend on the governor’s desk.

Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed The Puppy Mill bill (otherwise known as Assembly Bill 241, The Responsible Breeder Act of 2009.)

“This measure would make it a crime for any person or entity to own or control more than 50 unsterilized adult dogs or cats for breeding or raising for sale as pets,” Schwarzenegger wrote in his veto message.

“I support measures designed to prevent animal cruelty and that punish persons engaged in the abuse of animals. However, this measure simply goes too far in an attempt to address the serious problem of puppy mills. An arbitrary cap on the number of animals any entity can possess throughout the state will not end unlawful, inhumane breeding practices. Instead this measure has the potential to criminalize the lawful activities of reputable breeders, pet stores, kennels, and charitable organizations engaged in raising service and assistance dogs.”

Similar legislation limiting the number of dogs in puppy mills passed last year in Louisiana and Virginia.

“It’s embarrassing, we are so behind on so many issues,” said Judie Mancuso, the Orange County force behind the Puppy Mill bill and the Snip-the-Roamers spay-neuter bill. (You can read her initial thoughts over here). ”California is supposed to be a leader, but we’re just dragging our knuckles along.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Komen funds Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening, not abortions

October 8th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

PD*10078069We received several phone calls from readers angry that many Susan G. Komen for the Cure affiliates - including Orange County’s - provide money to Planned Parenthood affiliates.

“I don’t want my donations to pay for abortions!” one irate woman told us.

So let’s set the record straight:

“The bottom line is that all of our community grants are restricted and closely monitored to provide vital breast health education, screening and treatment services for underserved women,” said Sonia Aujla, spokeswoman for OC’s Komen, in an email.

The Watchdog’s recent story on Komen’s finances did not list the Planned Parenthood grant because it’s small, and does not rank among the top grants given. In the tax returns we examined, OC’s Komen gave nearly $1 million to community groups for breast cancer screening, education and treatment; Planned Parenthood got the aforementioned $32,749 - about 3 percent of the total.

This sort of controversy is not new to Komen, and Aujla pointed us to a rather exhaustive treatment of the prickly Planned Parenthood topic on Komen’s national web site.

“Susan G. Komen for the Cure exists for only one reason: to save lives and to end breast cancer forever,” wrote Eric Winer, M.D., Komen’s chief scientific advisor, in an open letter to critics. Read the rest of this entry »

Charity checkup: Race for the Cure pumps millions into breast cancer research

October 6th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

race-1There was a lot of pink at the 18th annual Susan G. Komen Orange County Race for the Cure, which drew some 30,000 people to  Newport Beach last week, and raised $2.5 million to battle breast cancer. (Hats off to the survivors and their senses of humor, including the woman who wore the ”Saving the TaTa One Step at a Time” T-shirt.)

An editor at The Orange County Register - which is a sponsor of the race - wondered aloud to us at The Watchdog about how Komen handles its money. And every reporter knows that if an editor wonders something, it’s a story.

So we spent some time with the organization’s tax returns and learned that Komen has two main branches that  funneled more than $300 million into breast cancer research, screening and treatment in the last fiscal year. The Komens get high marks from charity watchdogs - four out of four possible stars from Charity Navigator. Meet:

  • The national office in Texas, which distributed $100 million in 2008 for medical research;
  • And 122 affiliates (including OC’s), which funded much of that research through the national office (some $33.4 million) and  provided $106.9 million for local cancer screening and education. 

Orange County’s Komen is fundraising until October 16, to meet its $3 million Race goal.

NATIONAL

The national office, in Texas, hands out the research grants - including $3.2 million for California researchers at the likes of UC San Diego, UC San Francisco and the University of Southern California. Read the rest of this entry »

The hamburger patty that almost killed Stephanie Smith

October 5th, 2009, 1:38 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

burgerIf you enjoy a big juicy hamburger every now and again, you might want to read the New York Times’ stomach-churning story about the beef patty that nearly killed Stephanie Smith.

Smith, 22, ate a burger that her mother had grilled for their Sunday dinner. She wound up with a severe form of food-borne illness caused by E. coli, which shut down her kidneys, sent her into seizures, and prompted doctors to put her in a coma for nine weeks. When Smith awoke, she was paralyzed from the waist down.

The Times does a terrifying job tracing where the meat that wound up in Smith’s burger came from - and the gaping holes in the federal food safety system.

“Ms. Smith’s reaction to the virulent strain of E. coli was extreme, but tracing the story of her burger, through interviews and government and corporate records obtained by The New York Times, shows why eating ground beef is still a gamble,” the story says. “Neither the system meant to make the meat safe, nor the meat itself, is what consumers have been led to believe.”

Gulp.

More Watchdog: