A great big hurrah for our colleagues at The Los Angeles Times and ProPublica.
After revealing that the California Board of Registered Nursing “often takes years to act on complaints of egregious misconduct, leaving nurses accused of wrongdoing free to practice without restrictions.” Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger booted most members of the board on Monday, “citing the unacceptable time it takes to discipline nurses accused of egregious misconduct.”
The investigation makes your hair curl. Nurses who had abused patients - in just about every way you can imagine - ”continued to work unrestricted for years despite documented histories of incompetence, violence, criminal convictions and drug theft or abuse.” Many of those nurses had clean records even though they had been suspended, fired, disciplined by another licensing board or restricted from practicing in other states.
This is the kind of work that makes California safer.
Other watchdog news of note:
More Watchdog:
- Phantom resignation letter presumes appointment to empty seat; election would be too pricey, district says
- LWV board will weigh changes to recall ballot Tuesday
- Sheriff finds “missing footage” in jail beating lawsuit
- Why OC sheriffs attended Michael Jackson’s funeral
- Stuck with decades-worth of spent nuclear fuel? Sue!
- ‘What a bargain!’ (Or, the quarter-million-dollar water exec update)
- Thousands of public pools in California are still unsafe
- LWV calls police on rebel Mike Curtis after he refuses to leave meeting
- Is toll road agency shielding a criminal? Spooked driver in ‘whodunnit?’ says yes
- Watchdog roundup: Paintings, doctors, livers, for sale…?
- Anaheim police chief’s gun disappears. Twice.
- Dog fancier objects to ‘gonad police’ and Snip-the-Roamers bill
- A quarter-million dollars: Average compensation for water district GMs
- Seniors’ recall election may end up in court - before it even happens!
- Why TrueBallot won’t conduct LWV election, in its own words
- LWV’s take on why TrueBallot won’t be election czar
- State slaps water district with $204,000 fine
- ‘Mandatory spay-neuter doesn’t work!’ Or…does it?
- High-flying water board member resigns amid turbulence
- Controversial pet spay-neuter law gets closer to governor’s desk
- California’s $3 billion stem-cell experiment suffers from appearance of self-dealing
- Showdown on statewide spay/neuter law for pets slated for Tuesday
- Airplane whisks OC water official to ceremony in, er, Riverside
- OC air marshal - fired for revealing bad plan - is denied whistleblower protection
- Some water officials use office for personal gain, report says
- Tax prep giant must stop deceptive ads and pay more than $1 million
- Fair gets slapped for promotional cartoons
- No, San Onofre is not closing down any time soon!
- County pays $250,000 in sheriff car accident
- Charitable giving down more than $6 billion as economy tanks
- Saddleback College defends senior fitness classes
- Is college cheating state for seniors’ fitness classes?
- All systems go for contentious, first-ever, recall election in Laguna Woods Village
- LWV weighs in with official statement on first-ever recall election
- Candidate OKs $10 million for execs of bankrupt bank
- Secret extremist agenda: To outlaw dogs as pets, says spay/neuter law critic
- Grand jury: Street’s big bet ‘imprudent’
- As OC Fair graduates from cattle drive to film production, some are outraged
- OC Fair executives accept gifts worth thousands
- Great Park tries to keep contamination info under wrap
- Drought-induced building freeze not necessary - yet, officials say
- Is ’severe drought’ just a chance to hike water rates? Residents wonder
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
I would like to offer some facts as a past BRN Board Member:
Three Board members termed out of their appointments and were replaced, not fired. One BRN board member resigned.
The Department of Consumer Affair(DCA) employs all investigators for many of the Boards under their jurisdiction. Most of investigators are not RNs. Once a c/o comes into the BRN web site/other (BRN is not an independent body) it is sent directly to the Department of Investigation which is part of DCA. The BRN does not even know about a c/o against a nurse until the investigators send the case to them. The budget of the BRN is controlled by DCA. DCA has not allowed the BRN to hire their own investigators. The Medical Board has 76 investigators with only 22,000 licensees. The BRN has no investigators with 350,000 licensees. Bottom line: The BRN financially supports DCA activities vs paying for the BRN to have their own investigators from RN licensing fees ($22M/yr).You do the math.The wrong culprit was targeted.