Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Watchdog ~ Your tax dollars at work.

San Onofre performance will improve, officials vow

May 20th, 2009, 11:00 am · 3 Comments · posted by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

san-onofre-northThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission took a tougher-than-usual tone with the operators of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station at a May 7 meeting on SanO’s safety, colleague Vik Jolly tells us (Read Jolly’s full story on the packed meeting here):

  • The feds are concerned about continuing human performance problems at the plant, which operator Southern California Edison has promised to fix, but without much success.
  • SCE reiterated promises to improve, and said that, this time, things will be different: A new senior leadership team of nuclear industry experts is in place, and will be working with federal regulators as the feds do more intensive inspections.

Seeking some context, we at The Watchdog pored over newspaper clippings on San Onofre from the 1960s, 70s and 80s, and were dazzled by the complicated relationship Orange County seems to have always had with the reactors. Giant San Onofre Plant Proves ‘Crowd-Stopper,’ reads a Sept. 13, 1965 story in the Register:

“Though the giant San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station won’t be finished until late 1966, it already has proved a major Southern California tourist attraction …officials report that 58,400 visitors stopped at the site during the first four months of this year….Visitors have come from all 50 states and 27 foreign couconstruction-unit-1ntries to tour a modernistic information center at the station’s site and watch construction of the plant itself in a vast manmade canyon fronting on the Pacific Ocean…. The largest group of foreign tourists during the year came from Cambodia.”

The plant was affectionately referred to as the “world’s biggest beach ball” in 1966, but headlines like “Citizens Attack Atom Power Generator Expansion Plans” were the order of the day in 1970, and in 1983, the story was how the now-closed SONGS reactor 1 got low safety marks from the NRC. That report noted three instances in which plant technicians did not recognize potentially dangerous problems.

Not so vastly different, one could argue, from what’s happening today. People still run the machines, and people are still people.

That folks are still arguing over the safety of  nuclear power some 40 years after the first reactors were fired up certainly says something. Exactly what it says depends on your vantage point, of course, but we’ll encourage you do that over on Pat Brennan’s GreenOC blog!

More Watchdog:

 

 

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis
Posted in: Nuclear stuffPublic healthPublic safety
 
ADVERTISEMENT

 3 Comments

  • Tom Adams says:

    sa onofre is a dangerous joke… always has been—

  • MVAgusta says:

    Tom - care to share some insight with that claim or are you just pissing in the wind? You should probably educate yourself in that particular plant’s stats and record before you hurl your baseless claims. San Onofre’s safety record is unmatched by any conventional power generation plant.

  • NucBoy says:

    MVAgusta has it right. Yes, there are some problems with human performance, but the plant is sound, the people working there are as professional and expert as NASA. Those working there take the responsibility of running a nuclear power plant very, very seriously, as they should.
    “Tom Adams” claims are baseless, cruel, unjust, and unfounded.
    Most people could not work with the level of rigor and attention to detail required there. But thousands do at San Onofre, every day.

Leave a Reply