
Yowsa! Friday, a powerful Congressional committee demanded that American International Group cough up an exhaustive inventory of potentially mortifying documents, including:
Rep. Henry A. Waxman’s Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has already grilled AIG on its subsidiary’s $443,344 retreat for top-performing independent insurance agents at the St. Regis Monarch Beach Resort, just weeks after the federal government’s $85 billion bailout of AIG (originally reported by yours truly).
But since then, a steady stream of post-bailout outrages has come to light, including:
Waxman’s letter to AIG CEO Edward M. Liddy notes that executives said they would “absolutely” not have approved the St. Regis retreat if they had known about it beforehand, and that AIG was “reevaluating the costs of all aspects of our operations in light of the new circumstances.”
Perhaps they should reevaluate their reevaluation?
AIG has four weeks to provide the exhaustive list of documents and information to Waxman’s committee (which is the principal oversight committee in the House of Representatives). AIG’s deadline is Friday, November 14.
Waxman isn’t the only one cracking down on AIG. New York’s attorney general threatened Thursday to take action against AIG unless generous executive bonuses and other costs were recovered.
Waxman’s entire letter to AIG can be found here (the text is also pasted below).
Really looking forward to seeing this stuff!
More Watchdog:
“In response to reports that AIG spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on extravagant employee events after receiving an $85 billion rescue package, Chairman Waxman requested a detailed listing of all conferences, events, or retreats paid for by AIG this year as well as bonuses paid to AIG executives.
October 17, 2008
Mr. Edward M. Liddy
Chief Executive Officer
American International Group, Inc.
70 Pine Street
New York, NY 10270
Dear Mr. Liddy:
I am writing to request additional information and documents as part of the Oversight Committee’s investigation into the federal rescue of the American International Group and its connection to the ongoing financial crisis.
During the Committee’s hearing on October 7, 2008, witnesses were asked about a week-long conference held at the St. Regis Monarch Beach Resort approximately one week after the Treasury Department agreed to spend $85 billion to save AIG from collapse. Your predecessor, former CEO Robert Willumstad, told the Committee that the charges of $200,000 for rooms, $23,000 for spa services, and $7,000 on greens fees seemed “very inappropriate” and that he “absolutely” would not have approved them. His predecessor, former CEO Martin Sullivan, testified that, “if I’d have seen bills like that, I can assure you as the CEO I would’ve been asking questions.” The next day, you sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Paulson explaining that although this retreat was “standard practice in our industry,” you were “reevaluating the costs of all aspects of our operations in light of the new circumstances in which we are all operating.”
Since then, there have been reports that AIG may have paid for other similar events held after receiving access to $85 billion in taxpayer funds, such as an event on September 20, 2008, at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Washington, D.C., with over 800 people and a hunting trip in England for AIG executives that reportedly cost $85,000. Yesterday, you and the New York Attorney General announced that AIG would be cancelling over 160 conferences and events.
To assist the Committee in investigating this issue, I ask that AIG provide the Committee with a listing of all conferences, events, or retreats paid for by AIG, its subsidiaries, or affiliates from January 1, 2008, to the present, along with documents sufficient to show the charges paid for each conference, event, or retreat, including lodging, transportation, food, drink, and other charges. I also ask that you provide a listing of any similar conferences, events, or retreats planned for the next six months.
In addition, I ask that you provide the Committee with additional information and documents relating to the actions taken by Joseph Cassano, the head of AIG’s Financial Products Division; bonus payments made to AIG executives; and the use of funds provided by the federal government to date. Specifically, I request that you provide to the Committee:
1. All documents and communications, including e-mails, sent, received, or reviewed by Joseph Cassano, William Kolbert, Pierre Micottis, or Doug Poling during the two-year period ending on October 15, 2008;
2. All documents relating to the weekly “Global Conference Calls” conducted by AIG’s Financial Products Division, including presentations, transcripts, minutes, and audio recordings, for the two-year period ending on October 15, 2008;
3. A listing of all compensation and perquisites provided to Mr. Cassano from 2000 to the present, other than salary and cash bonus information previously provided to the Committee;
4. For each of the following groups, the number of employees in each group; the total amount of base salary paid to each group annually from January 1, 2006, to the present; and the total amount of non-base salary cash compensation (e.g., cash bonus or other incentive payments) paid to each group annually from January 1, 2006, to the present:
a. All employees of AIG, its subsidiaries, and its affiliates;
b. Participants in AIG’s Partners Plan;
c. Participants in AIG’s Senior Partners Plan; and
d. Employees of the Financial Products Division;
5. The total amount of funds received from the Federal Reserve through the $85 billion credit facility agreement announced on September 16, 2008, and the $37.2 billion securities lending agreement announced on October 8, 2008.
6. A detailed description of the uses of the funds identified in response to question 8, including the identities of any counterparties to which funds were provided for collateral or other purposes, the date the funds were provided to the counterparties, and the amount of the funds involved.
Please provide these documents and information to the Committee by Friday, November 14, 2008.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee in the House of Representatives and has broad oversight jurisdiction as set forth in House Rule X. An attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to respond to the Committee’s request.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Roger Sherman or Michael Gordon of the Committee staff at (202) 225-5051.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Enclosure
cc: Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
Thank goodness someone is paying attention!
Finally, some justice!! Good riddens, you greedy low lifes.
Another Waxman investigation? Don’ t make me laugh. Look at the idiot’s track record from the murder of Pat Tillman right down the line. He wastes taxdollars on months of investigations and, in the end, accomplishes nothing. Vote this fool out of office. He’s bilking the taxpayer. He’s tied to the hip of the wall street crooks just like the rest of ‘em, Our government is just as corrupt as mexico’s. Waxman is a flim-flam con artist.
Man, you should recieve the honorary award of the year. Thank you.
Do you realize that most sales positions receive incentives like the AIG event? That most insurance companies reward top producers. Why would a salesperson stay at a job that does not reward their effort? Also incentives are not only in the insurance industry.
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/auto/20020115a.asp
An article about how much sales incentives add to the price of a new car.
…. a very ‘detailed letter’… 4 weeks may not be enough time for all that info…. even with all the frustration toward AIG, this company will survive, and have a stock price of $10. per share in 12-15months…
So Charl…
You’re saying is that conferences are sales incentives similar to those offered in the car industry and that those sales incentives add to the price of a car.
You’re not exactly making a strong case for the continuation of these sales conferences are you?
Oh, and by the way, these sales conferences have been for “financial advisors” contracted with AIG. So are they REAL financial advisors who are judged on the performance of their client portfolios or are they just “Top Producers”, in other words, salesmen who just move a lot of high-commission products?
Regardless, I would imagine that even a stockbroker wouldn’t like to be compared to a car salesman.
I’m curious to know how much AIG is to pay out as of today on the insurance policies they backed for the hedge funds against Leighman failing?
Also I’d love to know:
List of names in government who approved / pushed for bailout of AIG.
How many of these names are associated to any of these hedge funds who needed AIG to survive until Oct. 21, 2008 for the insurance policies to come to payout.
If any connection is found between government officials and this insurance blood money, they should be investigated, charged and jailed.
I am surprised that AIG didn’t put their party plans on halt after they received the government backing. Were they that high up in the sky that they didn’t think that spending on crap wasn’t going to be reviewed by the government who sent them such a huge bailout.
I understand that the division that partied hard wasn’t the same division that failed but still they could have put those plans to party on halt for the time being until they regained their composure and got the company back on steam.
They definitely deserve what they are getting themselves into.
I am trying to set up a forum to discuss all things related to the banking industry’s collapse, if you’re interested I am looking for new members to join.
http://www.bailoutdisaster.com/
I agree with ocobserver. If Waxman was so concerned about taxpayers, then why did he vote for the $700B Wall Street Bailout? Holding investigations and pretending to be concerned about how taxpayer’s dollars are spent is very weak Henry. Your actions speak louder than words. Let’s vote this Bum out!
I hope this is not just another posturing act and ploy to convince the tax payers that a politician is genuine about cleaning up AIG.
Even if Waxman received everything requested, how is he going to validate the information. What are the next steps and consequences to ensure prosecution of AIG.
Who are we prosecuting? Are we prosecuting AIG the building or each individual Executive. Are they really responsible for reckless spending of TaxPayer money and if so how do we prove that in a court of law.
The bailout should of never happened in the first place. Just more chaos and confusion to null out the common sense.
Why won’t they demand that they disclose all of AIG’s credit default swap positions?
Oh wait. That only makes sense. Who cares about the pennies when the trillions of dollars are at risk.
What is the government going to do, ask for a refund of the costs that Waxman’s committee finds wasteful? The money has been spent and the government has no control over the companies they give the money too. The only method of disapproval they have is to refuse to give more grants to these companies and politically they can’t stop. AIG has the upper hand here and can do anything they want as long as their senior managers will grovel a little before congress.
Lost in Paradise - actually, the government can do quite a bit going forward on controlling how the company spends money - we the people now have an 80 percent stake in AIG….Cuomo is pressuring the company to recoup millions with the threat of criminal actions, and the Waxman committee has been successful so far in embarrassing the company into cancelling 160 events worth $80 million. So…there *is* a lot that can be done…
American International GANGSTERS