<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compensation for sheriffs&#8217; union GM rose 80 percent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/</link>
	<description>Your tax dollars at work.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Alan, that was actually my first personal attack on you.  I put another attacking your integrity on another board.

But, this isn't a moderated board, so why not open up a flame war?  Lets start with calling each other 'trolls' over and over and over.  Strongsidejedi might want to write that word down.  He seems stuck on one word in the lexicon.  This board is run by amateurs.

Well, at least you stay on message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, that was actually my first personal attack on you.  I put another attacking your integrity on another board.</p>
<p>But, this isn&#8217;t a moderated board, so why not open up a flame war?  Lets start with calling each other &#8216;trolls&#8217; over and over and over.  Strongsidejedi might want to write that word down.  He seems stuck on one word in the lexicon.  This board is run by amateurs.</p>
<p>Well, at least you stay on message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>Bucky, another &lt;b&gt;personal and emotional attack&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;i&gt;useless&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucky, another <b>personal and emotional attack</b>. <i>useless</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>Alan,

Now, you're just being a jerk.  Eliz was correcting my use of the term Sheriff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>Now, you&#8217;re just being a jerk.  Eliz was correcting my use of the term Sheriff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseball fever</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>baseball fever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>How about those Angels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about those Angels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>So this entire union represents one (1) person?

&lt;b&gt;1,800 members&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this entire union represents one (1) person?</p>
<p><b>1,800 members</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Eliz,

Thank you.  There is only one Sheriff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliz,</p>
<p>Thank you.  There is only one Sheriff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strongsidejedi</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Strongsidejedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Obviously there was no hijacking of any boards.  The comments were fact based and not attacking on others.

The attempts by some here to attack the personality of the individual rather than focus on the facts is reflective of "internet troll" behavior.

The trolls can go back to their underground cave.  The rest of us are going to keep focusing on the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously there was no hijacking of any boards.  The comments were fact based and not attacking on others.</p>
<p>The attempts by some here to attack the personality of the individual rather than focus on the facts is reflective of &#8220;internet troll&#8221; behavior.</p>
<p>The trolls can go back to their underground cave.  The rest of us are going to keep focusing on the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliz</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>There is only 1 (one) Sheriff everyone...then there is an under sheriff or asst. sheriff etc...But only one sheriff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only 1 (one) Sheriff everyone&#8230;then there is an under sheriff or asst. sheriff etc&#8230;But only one sheriff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Alan,

I've actually known more people in uniform in many ways.  I've worked with law enforcement, myself.  And I don't just mean local.  I don't recall arguing that the Sherrif's shouldn't receive an increase.  It is dishonest for you to say that, but it helps your case, doesn't it?  Besides, why are you throwing the whole organization out in front to take the bullet for the GM of the union?

You had no problem with Strongsidejedi hijacking the other boards.  You said nothing.  You even threw in your tangents and innuendo.  You had no issue with loss of focus when you threw out all that chaff to cloud the issues and change the subject.

Mark Sanderon,

I haven't made any comment about the Sherrif's department.  The few OC Sherrif''s I've known are upstanding individuals and I'm sympathetic to what they went through with Corona.  Again, aren't we talking about the GM of the union?

Alan does no service for the boys and the disaffected volunteers in Scouting at the unit level.  He only sticks up for the upper management.

I like the honor by association bit---Sheriffs and Scouts.  The appeal to pity is wonderful.  But, those Sheriff's are pretty big and have guns.  I'm sure they aren't easily picked on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve actually known more people in uniform in many ways.  I&#8217;ve worked with law enforcement, myself.  And I don&#8217;t just mean local.  I don&#8217;t recall arguing that the Sherrif&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t receive an increase.  It is dishonest for you to say that, but it helps your case, doesn&#8217;t it?  Besides, why are you throwing the whole organization out in front to take the bullet for the GM of the union?</p>
<p>You had no problem with Strongsidejedi hijacking the other boards.  You said nothing.  You even threw in your tangents and innuendo.  You had no issue with loss of focus when you threw out all that chaff to cloud the issues and change the subject.</p>
<p>Mark Sanderon,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t made any comment about the Sherrif&#8217;s department.  The few OC Sherrif&#8217;&#8217;s I&#8217;ve known are upstanding individuals and I&#8217;m sympathetic to what they went through with Corona.  Again, aren&#8217;t we talking about the GM of the union?</p>
<p>Alan does no service for the boys and the disaffected volunteers in Scouting at the unit level.  He only sticks up for the upper management.</p>
<p>I like the honor by association bit&#8212;Sheriffs and Scouts.  The appeal to pity is wonderful.  But, those Sheriff&#8217;s are pretty big and have guns.  I&#8217;m sure they aren&#8217;t easily picked on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnb</title>
		<link>http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/336/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/10/compensation-for-sheriffs-union-top-brass-rose-74-percent/#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>Alan anytime the writer posts INFORMATION, you call it a smear. She's just shining the light on these groups. 
Alan, walk toward the light, you've wandered over to the "dark side" :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan anytime the writer posts INFORMATION, you call it a smear. She&#8217;s just shining the light on these groups.<br />
Alan, walk toward the light, you&#8217;ve wandered over to the &#8220;dark side&#8221; <img src='http://taxdollars.freedomblogging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>