Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Watchdog ~ Your tax dollars at work.

Protest backfires: State bigwigs will get early pay cut

November 20th, 2009, 12:15 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

capitol-sactoHere’s a big one for the “Oops, that sure backfired!” file:

We told you yesterday that the California Legislature quietly tried to block an 18 percent cut to its pay and perks (even as the state budget was hemorrhaging) by raising questions about the legality of such cuts. Legislators appealed to the Attorney Generalfor an opinion on whether the citizens commission that ordered the cuts had the authority to do so - and the AG said yes, yes, most certainly yes!

Those cuts were originally to take effect in December 2010, at the start of a brand new term. But the AG said, essentially, “Why wait?” The cuts can legally take effect midstream in an elected’s term, in his opinion, and so they will - beginning next month. That will save the state some $2.8 million. (A very small drop in the $21 billion bucket, but every little bit helps. See chart of officials’ salaries below.)

“In hindsight, it might have been better to let sleeping dogs lie,” said Chuck Murray, chairman of the  California Citizens Compensation Commission, which ordered the cuts, to the San Francisco Chronicle

Of course, this doesn’t mean the game is over. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

$100,000-plus pension club in Mesa Consolidiated, Mission Viejo, Moulton Niguel

November 20th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

joy-of-not-workingSo we continue our trek through the CalPERS database of public retirees today with three more OC agencies - which have five retirees who get pensions greater than $100,000 a year.

These three are interesting exceptions to the emerging rules. In general, the most well-paid retirees have been public safety types - police and fire chiefs - and they have been men.

But two of today’s agencies are water districts - so no expensive benefits for public safety employees; and the other is a city that contracts with the Sheriff’s Department for police services, thus keeping high public safety pension expenses off its own books.

And two of the three most well-paid retirees at these agencies are women. The agencies are:

  • Mesa Consolidated Water District in Costa Mesa, which has two (the top dog being Diana Leach, former general manager, $145,393.56),
  • Mission Viejo, which has one (former planning diretor Clinton Sherrod, $107,241.12)
  • and the Moulton Niguel Water District, which as two (the top dog being former administrator Carol Sanders, $130,674.36).

This brings total membership in the local CalPERS $100,000-plus pension club to a round 200, from 15 different public agencies. We still have a dozen to go. See full lists, links to previous stories and standard disclaimer below.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Fair board complaint could die

November 19th, 2009, 4:44 pm by Jennifer Muir

Allegations that the Orange County Fair Board violated open meeting and conflict of interest laws may not ever be officially resolved.

Orange County’s head lawyer Nicholas Chrisos last month complained about the fair board to the state Attorney General, who declined to look at the case. See, the AG also represents the fair board on legal matters, so it would be a conflict. Plus, the county’s District Attorney should investigate crimes in OC, the attorney general said.

DA spokeswoman Susan Schroeder said earlier this week that the attorney general was forwarding the complaint to her office, and they’d look into it. This morning she clarified: The AG responded to the county, and did not forward the case to the district attorney. So her office is waiting on the county to file a complaint before they can investigate, she says.

That might not happen. When asked today whether the county plans to pursue the allegations further, a spokeswoman would only cryptically say: “County counsel is reviewing its options.”

Chrisos’ complaint alleges that the fair board misused public money when they hired former state Sen. Dick Ackerman and a consulting firm to influence the state’s sale of the fair grounds. Fair board members also have formed a nonprofit that’s looking into buying the 150-acre fairgrounds and if they do, could get perks such as free parking, Chrisos wrote. So, Chrisos argues, the fair board used the public money to pay for contracts that could personally benefit them financially.

Fair board members also are quiet on the complaint and referred calls to board chairwoman Kristina Dodge. A secretary for Dodge said she would not be available until Friday.

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

State legislators fail to block their own pay cuts. Bummer.

November 19th, 2009, 12:50 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

capitol-sactoBy Teri Sforza and Lindsey Ambrose

Pity the poor California senators and Assembly members! Not only are they presiding over a state that seems to be spiraling down the toilet – they’re going down (some) with the ship as well.

Just one day after the Legislative Analyst’s Office announced that California is staring a new $21 billion budget deficit in the face, legislators got the really bad news: Their pay and perks can, and apparently will, be sliced 18 percent to help deal with the shortfall. (That means a drop from $116,208 to $95,291 for legislators, and from $133,639 to $109,584 for legislative leaders.)

In May, a heavy-hearted citizens’ commission ordered up the cuts (despite the incredibly good job the Legislature is doing). Then, in September, the Legislature quietly asked the attorney general whether that citizens’ commission had the legal authority to order those cuts, and offered pages of legal arguments as to why it did not. (Some cynical types interpreted that as an attempt to dodge the bullet.)

Today, though, Attorney General Jerry Brown dashed those hopes. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Oops. Correa challenger doesn’t live in Correa’s district

November 19th, 2009, 11:23 am by BRIAN JOSEPH, Sacramento Correspondent

Orange County’s corner of the political blogosphere has been abuzz with talk of a mysterious GOP candidate who has emerged as a challenger to Democratic state Sen. Lou Correa of Santa Ana.

Earlier this month, the Orange Juice Blog asked “Who is Sue Perez and why is she challenging Senator Correa?” Red County.com revealed that Perez had hired veteran political consultant Dave Gilliard, who told the blog that Perez “has 12 years of broadcast experience as host of a highly popular syndicated talk show, ‘Our Town’, watched by millions of viewers on the TBN network” and “holds a Doctorate of Ministry Degree, as well as an undergraduate degree in Criminal Justice.”

In fact, Perez, a former employee of the Heritage Family Fellowship church, officially filed with the California secretary of state her intent to run for election in Correa’s 34th District in 2010.

Bloggers have wondered aloud who she is and what she hopes to accomplish. But one thing they haven’t asked is whether she actually meets the basic requirements of candidacy.

There aren’t much, but the state does require that you live in the district you want to represent. And Perez doesn’t live in the 34th District. She and her husband, Ed, live in the 33rd, which is represented by Mimi Walters. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

U.S. to fired air marshal: You should have known better, kid

November 19th, 2009, 6:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

airplane(Vote: Should Robert MacLean get his job back?)

The inciting incident came during a bitter tussle between federal air marshals and management - when the government required air marshals to have buzz cuts and wear business suits and hustle past lines at airport security checkpoints. (This essentially screamed to would-be terrorists: AIR MARSHAL! AIM HERE! many air marshals felt.)

It was in the thick of such management-employee conflict that OC air marshal Robert MacLean appeared on NBC news in 2005, in his role as vice president of the air marshals’ professional organization (it’s not a union). That appearance, the agency soon concluded, required prior approval. It launched an investigation. And in the course of that investigation, it asked MacLean if he was a source for an NBC story a few years back, about how air marshals’ overnight missions were to be cancelled to save money on hotel bills (even in the midst of an unprecedented suicide hijacking alert).

It’s, er, a crime to lie to federal investigators.

MacLean was axed from his cop-in-the-sky job and has been fighting to get it back ever since. This big-picture context is part of the closing arguments that have been filed by the federal government (government-closing-arguments) and MacLean (maclean-closing-arguments), nicely summarizing each side’s stance. The judge is expected to make a decision in the coming weeks.

The government’s last word: MacLean’s 14 years of solid service as a Border Patrol agent and air marshal didn’t matter in the end. MacLean knew, or should have known, that information he disclosed to the media in 2003 was sensitive security information, and MacLean’s protestation that he did not know “is not believable,” the Homeland Security Administration says. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Vote! Should fired air marshal get his job back?

November 19th, 2009, 5:59 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

maclean(Read the latest here)

Robert MacLean of Ladera Ranch was axed from his cop-in-the-sky job after letting the world know about an ill-conceived plan to remove federal air marshals from long distance flights in 2003 - just days after a terrifying suicide hijacking alert. (This to save money on hotel bills.)

There was a huge outcry; the plan was scrapped; and missions went on as per usual. But MacLean was fired for disclosing “sensitive security information” (even though the message wasn’t marked as such, and went to his non-secure cell phone, rather than his secure PDA). Then he was denied whistleblower status

His appeal is now pending before a federal administrative law judge. What do you think?

Should Robert MacLean get back his job as a federal air marshal?
  • Add an Answer
View Results
Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Shop online? You may have been ripped off

November 18th, 2009, 12:06 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

shopSo you’re booking your flight, or ordering your movie tickets, or paying for your pizza online. It’s a mainstream web site. No worries.

You type in your credit card information, click the “purchase” button, and enjoy your flight/movie/pizza. But a few months later, mystery charges of $10 to $20 a month appear on your bank statement, for membership in a club you have no  memory of joining.

Surprise! You’ve been a victim of consumer fraud - thanks to that web site you trusted.

The practice is pervasive, and has cost unsuspecting consumers $1.4 billion, according to “Aggressive Sales Tactics on the Internet and Their Impact on American Consumers,” an investigative report released Tuesday by the  U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (You can read the full report here: online-ripoffs; and can find supporting documents here.)

Companies named in the report - and apparently profiting on the scam - include 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.; AirTran Holdings, Inc.; Classmates.com, Inc.; Continental Airlines, Inc.; FTD, Inc.; Fandango, Inc.; Hotwire, Inc.; Intelius, Inc.; MovieTickets.com, Inc.; Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.; Pizza Hut, Inc.; Priceline.com, Inc.; Redcats USA, Inc.; Shutterfly, Inc.; US Airways Group, Inc.; and VistaPrint USA, Inc. (But that’s not all of them; there are many, many, many more.)

How does the scam work? Consider the experience of Chris Steffen of Los Angeles, who bought movie tickets through Movietickets.com in April 2007. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis