Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Watchdog ~ Your tax dollars at work.

Public pension reform initiatives are filed for 2010 ballot

November 6th, 2009, 1:34 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

broken-piggy-bankTapping in to public outrage over gold-plated public employee pensions, the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility filed two reform initiatives with the state Attorney General’s office on Thursday.

“With more than $200 billion in retirement debts and skyrocketing costs crowding out the investments we need in education, health care, transportation, public safety and the environment, it is time for a statewide solution to our retirement benefits crisis,” said foundation president Marcia Fritz in a prepared statement.

By requiring all new non-safety public employees at all levels of government to work until their Social Security retirement age for full benefits and ending the politicians’ raids and abuses of public pension funds, California public agencies can offer secure retirement benefits that are fair for taxpayers and their employees,” she said.

The Public Employee Benefits Reform Initiative would apply a benefits cap to the benefit plans offered to all new state, local government, school district, university and special district employees beginning July 1, 2011.

Early estimates show the initiative would save more than $1 billion the first year, and $500 billion over 30 years, as new workers replace those who retire.

How? By raising the age at which workers can retire with full benefits, and by limiting guaranteed benefit formulas to 75 percent of pay for a full career’s work. ”Significant additional savings would come from requiring new employees to wait until they reach MediCare eligibility age before supplemental retiree health benefits begin,” the foundation says.

The “Ten Commandments” of both versions of the initiative include: Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Deep flaws haunt state’s system for attacking elder abuse, report says

November 6th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

elder-abuseThere are deep flaws in California’s approach to detecting and responding to elder abuse and neglect - flaws that prevent serious cases from ever coming to light, according to a new report form the California Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes.

California has more than 9,000 nursing and residential care facilities for the elderly, and 290,000 licensed beds, according to federal statistics. Riding herd on them are about 1,000 “long-term care ombudsmen” - people originally meant to be watchdog/mediators, doing spot checks of facilities, following up on complaints, and helping make life better for residents by serving as intermediates, and advocates, with management.

But something else has happened entirely, according to the report.

Because of laws California has adopted, these watchdog/mediators have morphed into the front line for investigating serious reports of elder abuse and neglect. That gives rise to several problems - the least of which may be that there’s no time for the routine spot checks and patient advocacy that was originally envisioned.

Ombudsmen - now legally tasked with very serious investigations of suspected abuse and neglect - can only tell law enforcement about problems if the complaining parties agree to release their names and complaints.

Only one-quarter agree to this. Which means 75 percent of complaints essentially disappear.

What precisely are we talking about here? Assault, sexual  harassment, financial exploitation, physical neglect…. grim stuff.

Why won’t people sign their names to complaints? Well, if you had to keep living in the place you were complaining about - or have your most basic and intimate needs attended to by someone you were complaining about - you might be a bit frightened of attaching your name to the complaint, too. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Full benefits for part-time elected officials are reasonable, mayor says

November 5th, 2009, 10:53 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

joel_lautenschle1Read the main story here

It’s “reasonable and customary” for local governments to provide full insurance coverage to part-time elected officials, the mayor of Laguna Hills says - and many public entities do just that.

We thank Joel Lautenschleger for responding to our question about the insurance issue, which makes that part-time city council job much more valuable than it might otherwise appear, in a pure dollars and cents sort of way. (Lautenschleger’s stipend as a councilmember was just $7,484 last year; but the city paid nearly $24,000 for his medical, dental, vision and other insurance, plus $1,324 into a retirement account.)

He didn’t like it that we singled out Laguna Hills. “It’s insulting and demeaning to suggest that we’re doing this just for the insurance,” he told us on the phone.

“The 18 years I have put in to public service have been ones of dedication to improving my community,” Lautenschleger said in an email. “I am very proud of not only helping to form this city but to have it run efficiently, honestly, safely, and with tremendous fiscal responsibility. It is why we get re-elected and if you would bother to look at some of the accomplishments instead of being a mouthpiece for a council challenger, you would see why people have expressed great satisfaction with this council over the years.”

(We object to the “mouthpiece” bit; we do not have feelings for or against council challenger Barbara Kogerman, but we certainly do like the public documents she has forwarded to us.)

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

It’s the health insurance, stupid!

November 5th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

city_council

Read the mayor’s response here

Why do people run for local office? Why are they willing to perch on those daises hour after hour, year after year, decade after decade, pondering sewer systems, street repairs, budget shortfalls and zoning updates?

Is it altruism at its purest? Is it a form of masochism?!

Certainly there’s great satisfaction in public service. And the prestige attendant to being a democratically elected representative is certainly nothing to sneeze at. But stipends for city councilmembers are notoriously low (especially when compared to, say, water districts), with the highest-paid city councilmembers getting just $1,500 a month or so, and most getting much less.

So it can’t be about the money. Or, can it?

Public documents obtained by a challenger in the Laguna Hills council race tell a very interesting story:

  • Yes, the annual council stipend is low: just $7,484 per member.
  • But the city pays nearly three times that much on insurance - health, medical, dental, vision, etc. - to the tune of $23,902, for a single councilmember, for a single year. (One Laguna Hills councilmember gets less - see details below.)
  • The city also pays into the California Public Employees Retirement System for councilmembers - $1,324 per councilmember last year.joel_lautenschle

Some of them also get travel and meeting expenses of several hundred dollars per year…. Not bad for a part-time job!

Let’s look at Joel Lautenschleger (right), who has been on the council since 1991. In 2008-09, his medical insurance cost $22,164; dental, $1,360; vision, $301; life and disability, $77. The PERS contribution was $1,324, and he got $898 for travel and meeting expenses.

You can see figures for previous years for him, and the rest of the council, below.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

‘Safety culture’ at San Onofre to be examined Thursday

November 4th, 2009, 12:20 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

san-onofre-beachgoersThe results of an “independent safety culture assessment” at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station will be presented to Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials at 6:30 p.m. Thursday in Dana Point, and the public is invited.

The NRC has been cracking down on people-related performance issues at San Onofre, and the nuclear plant has vowed to improve.  San Onofre  is run by Southern California Edison.

 The NRC has taken a tougher-than-usual tone with SanO this year (read colleague Vik Jolly’s story on a packed May meeting here).

City manager mum on expensive car

November 4th, 2009, 11:36 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

2010_toyota_sequoiaThe silence fromLaguna Hills officialdom was deafening after we asked about the city manager’s $60,000 Toyota last week.

Bruce Channing didn’t return our phone call or emails, but he did respond to our colleague Alejandra Molina - saying, essentially, that he wouldn’t say anything.

“It’s just unfortunately inappropriate for me to comment and weigh in on a part of a political campaign platform,” Channing said in a telephone message to Molina.

Read  Molina’s story about how Channing got the maximum performance bonus of $23,000 (10 percent of his salary) last year, as the economy was crumbling to pieces.

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Bicycle ticket could cost Santa Ana student $400

November 4th, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

sapdThe new semester had just begun. Oswald Muniz Sanchez was riding his bike to biology class at Santa Ana College, earphones in both ears, listening to the dulcet tones of National Public Radio.

Sanchez saw no cars at the intersection of Washington and Freeman streets, so he buzzed through the stop sign, as cyclists so often do. That’s when he saw the Santa Ana policeman, half-way up the side street.

Moments later, sirens blaring and lights flashing, Sanchez was pulled over. Santa Ana police Officer Berg told him to sit on the curb. How are you going to hear someone honking at you with earphones on? the officer asked. I heard you, Sanchez said. What music were you listening to?  the officer asked. It was just the news, Sanchez said. If you were in your car, would you have stopped? Yes, Sanchez said. Are you going to give me a warning? No, the offficer said. I’m going to cite you for running a stop sign.

The ticket was yellow, just like you’d get while driving a car. “Schwinn,” it says in the spot for “Year of Vehicle” and “Make.” And Sanchez was cited for violating two parts of the California Vehicle Code:

  • Section 22450(a): Failure to stop at stop sign;
  • and Section 27400: Wearing head set or earplugs.

Infraction, the ticket said. So when the courtesy notice landed in his mailbox from the Orange County Superior Court, Sanchez nearly choked: “Bail amount: $397.”

For riding his bike?! Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

PR consultant earned $295 an hour to champion doomed labor contract

November 3rd, 2009, 5:00 am by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

marathonIt may be worth noting that the fee paid to attorneys working death penalty cases is some $150 per hour.

Far better, then, to be the strategic communications consultant hired by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, to help shepherd tentative labor contracts to fruition.

Lichtenstein & Associates - doing business as Marathon Communications  - inked a deal with Met in July that pays it $295 per hour, “plus necessary expenses at Consultant’s actual cost without mark-up.” The mission: “To provide strategic communications consulting and counsel in support of Metropolitan’s labor agreements.” (See contract below.)

Marathon pulled down $25,000 in July, and $17,026 in August. (No billings yet for September.) The deal, for up to $100,000, runs through next year.

It may also be worth noting that the labor contracts Marathon was to champion to the public were withdrawn from consideration, after Met’s board signaled its displeasure last month. (The contracts included a pay raise of up to 23 percent over five years, and a pension hike of 25 percent forever. Board members - from SoCal cities and water districts - couldn’t vote for that in the midst of recession.)

Marathon Communications’ job was not to simply respond factually to questions about the contracts, but to mount something of a campaign in their favor. To wit:   Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

NRC dings Wal-Mart for radioactive exit signs

November 2nd, 2009, 12:40 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

walmart By Lindsey Ambrose

America’s biggest retailer is in trouble with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for improperly disposing of  radioactive  exit signs throughout the United States and Puerto Rico.

The NRC has cited Wal-Mart for violations concerning improper disposal and transfer of exit signs containing tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen. The violations were issued on October 28 claiming that from 2000 to 2008 Wal-Mart failed to properly dispose of 2,979 tritium signs. The company also failed to appoint an official responsible for complying with regulatory requirements issued by the NRC and failed to report broken or damaged signs as required.

Exit signs containing tritium do not pose a large threat to the public’s health, but a damaged or broken sign can cause minor radioactive contamination of the immediate environs and calls for prompt clean up. Thus, we’d say that proper record-keeping of broken signs isn’t a petty request.

The NRC could have imposed a $369,300 fine, but once Wal-Mart caught wind of the problem, it made a speedy effort to clean up its act. We are told Wal-Mart made a record of all tritium exit signs at its facilities nationwide, corrected contamination from damaged signs at several stores, and consequently removed all tritium exit signs in its stores and swapped them with signs that do not contain radioactive material. Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis

Turbulence is part of the ride, consultant says; Met will find labor solution

November 2nd, 2009, 12:23 pm by Teri Sforza, Register staff writer

argueWhen we at The Watchdog asked how much has been spent on consultants working on labor negotiations for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, we noted that the biggest bills came from Agreement Dynamics Inc (nearly $300,000 through July).

Agreement Dynamics advocates a kinder, gentler approach to negotiating called “interest-based bargaining.” This produced a controversial labor contract that was withdrawn earlier this month, and sent back to the drawing board - which has given rise to some hard feelings on the part of some employees. 

We asked Agreement Dynamics what their thinking was about the procees now, and where things might go in the future (Met hopes to have a new agreement on the table by February). Here’s the response we got from Rhonda Hilyer, president of Agreement Dynamics:

Thank you for your question about interest-based bargaining at the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. In my opinion, it’s a very important question because the outcome of this process will have a profound influence on this organization and those it serves.

Having been involved in labor relations for over 35 years, I have never seen unilateral approaches benefit any party over the long run. Interest-based bargaining is more challenging than traditional, position-based methods because it requires all parties to seek mutually-acceptable solutions. Like any negotiations, it can get very turbulent at times.

What will happen at Met? Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TwitThis